Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dermatol Reports ; 16(1): 9742, 2024 Mar 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38623364

ABSTRACT

In the wake of a global COVID-19 pandemic, where innovations in vaccination technology and the speed of development and distribution have been unprecedented, a wide variety of post-vaccination cutaneous reactions have surfaced. However, there has not been a systematic review that investigates pityriasis eruptions and the associated variants following COVID-19 inoculations. A PubMed search using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was performed to find case reports from the earliest record through November 2022. Data including types of vaccination and pityriasis were extracted and a quality review was performed; 47 reports with 94 patients were found: 64.9% had pityriasis rosea (PR), 3.2% PR-like eruptions, 16.0% pityriasis rubra pilaris, 7.4% pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta, 3.2% pityriasis lichenoides chronica, and 5.3% had reactions described as atypical. The top three COVID-19 vaccinations reported were Pfizer-BioNTech (47.9%), Oxford-AstraZeneca (11.7%), and Moderna (8.5%). Pityriasis reactivity was reported most frequently after the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination, with pityriasis rosea being the most common variant. A large difference was additionally found between the ratio of post-vaccination pityriasis reactions following Pfizer and Moderna vaccinations (5.63), and the ratio of Pfizer's usage in the United States as of December 28, 2022 relative to that of Moderna (1.59). Further studies with adequate follow-up periods and diagnostic testing will thus need to be performed to elucidate the root of this discrepancy and better characterize the association between different pityriasis reactions and COVID-19 vaccinations.

2.
Dermatol Reports ; 14(4): 9492, 2022 Nov 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36483219

ABSTRACT

Febrile Ulceronecrotic Mucha- Habermann Disease (FUMHD) is a variant of Pityriasis Lichenoides Et Varioliformis Acuta (PLEVA). Although rare, the condition may progress to involve serious complications and even lead to fatal outcomes if diagnosis and appropriate treatment is delayed. A PubMed search following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRIMSA) guidelines was performed to find cases of FUMHD from the earliest records to October 2021. Treatments, complications, and patient outcomes were extracted from the literature and summarized, while a review of quality was also performed. A total of 63 publications with 68 patients were found. Successful treatment modalities for FUMHD included antibiotics, antivirals, systemic steroids, Methotrexate (MTX), cyclophosphamide, Cyclosporine (CYA), Intravenous Immunoglobulins (IVIG), pentoxifylline, and ultraviolet B phototherapy. Out of 68 patients, 55 patients had their condition fully resolved and 13 cases were fatal. Increased age, systemic involvement, and monoclonal T-cell receptor rearrangement were associated with worst prognosis, but mucosal involvement did not affect mortality risk. Overall, the publications had low risk of bias, but most lacked adequate follow-up periods. FUMHD is a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge due to the lack of clearly defined diagnostic criteria and optimum treatment. Further studies with larger patient populations and longer follow-up periods may lead to refinement of diagnostic criteria, establish an optimum treatment regimen, and better estimate the likelihood of recurrence.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...